Quote:
Originally posted by ARTelevision
The problem is that in the above argument - and in the related preceeding ones, some things are called "real" and other things are described as not real. This is the foundation of the argument. Questions of what is real and what is not real are moot because they are undemonstrable and are the result of a priori assumption and individual belief systems.
|
...and basicly, if you're talking in science, EVERYTHING is real.