View Single Post
Old 07-20-2004, 10:00 PM   #41 (permalink)
Scipio
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
Here's my simple criticism of supply side economics, as that seems to be the direction that the thread is now taking.

The essence of supply side economics is the trickle down effect. The tax rates that the wealthy pay are lowered, and they take that extra money, grow it, and spread it through the economy.

There are simple economic reasons to think that this isn't a good idea. One, wealthy people have a relatively low marginal propensity to consume. This means that for each extra dollar they get out of a tax cut, they will spend less of it on consumption than middle and lower class people will.

Granted, the wealthy are able to spend their money on things that the poor can't, such as starting companies or investing in captial, human or otherwise. However, the past few years have shown that the wealthy don't always do this. Even after large tax cuts, significant gains in capital investment weren't observed.

There are many reasons that tax cuts that send more money to the lower and middle classes are more desireable. One, they spend the money, and it goes into the economy. When money starts moving, it gets spent multiple times, and drives the economy. Wealthy people are more likely to sit on the money they get for some time, so the economy doesn't benefit as much.

Two, from a welfare standpoint, it's better to give money to people who are having trouble making ends meet than it is to give money to people who are having trouble deciding what options to get on their third BMW.

Three, even though the rich aren't getting the money outright, they have shouldn't have much trouble getting a share of the money that went to those less well off, in that (many of them) make profit off of the purchases made by consumers. (And, as noted, the lower and middle classes will consume when they get tax cuts.)

Finally, I think that it's possible to have a capitalist republic that values keeping the distribution of wealth relatively narrow. I believe that people who work hard have a right to do well or even get quite rich, but no CEO is truly worth tens of millions of dollars a year.

Louis Brandeis put it best:

"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both. "
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."

Last edited by Scipio; 07-20-2004 at 10:06 PM..
Scipio is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360