Quote:
Originally posted by seretogis
I don't understand how enemy combatants who aren't US citizens have any constitutional rights at all. Wasn't the ruling only concerning US citizens who were captured and held as enemy combatants?
|
You're think of one of the other two Gitmo court cases (Hamdi or Paladia) that came out at the same time as Rasul v. Bush. Rasul v. Bush related to all of the enemy combatants that are being held in Gitmo.
__________________
I'm leaving for the University of California: Santa Barbara in 5 hours, give me your best college advice - things I need, good ideas, bad ideas, nooky, ect.
Originally Posted by Norseman on another forum:
"Yeah, the problem with the world is the stupid people are all cocksure of themselves and the intellectuals are full of doubt."
|