|
The reason this topic gets brought up is because it's a damn good one to discuss. Most people don't know what they're talking about with this discussion, but computer-savvy people can explain it in a small paragraph.
In a few sentences: Intel releases good processors with high clock speeds (gigahertz). AMD released good processors with lower clock speeds. AMD's processors are built completely different, allowing the entire AMD processor lineup to have the ability to perform as good (and better in about half of the tests) than Intel's chips. Think of it this way: AMD's processors are a Dodge Truck. Intel's processors are a Ferrari. AMD's can haul the weight when it comes down to it, but aren't as fast. Intel's processors can outrun AMD's, but can't haul weight. When it comes to gaming, AMD's "weigh-hauling ability" comes into play, allowing better performance. Media applications use raw clockspeed, allowing Intel's faster processors to take the lead.
I could go more in detail, but it's pointless. That's the most basic explanation ya need. AMD has found a way to design processors that kick ass without having huge clock speeds. Intel releases processors with huge clock speeds because it works. It's as simple as that! The reason many people prefer AMD over Intel? AMD's chips are cheaper than Intels. Much, much cheaper until recently (Intel lowered the prices on most of their processors...a damn good idea too).
-Lasereth
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert
|