PNAC is relevant because it highlights the long-standing desire to invade Iraq well before 9-11 handed the opportunity to Bush and Co. Anyone puzzled as to why Iraq was mentioned in the direct aftermath of 9-11 should know this.
So is your source suspect because it only upholds the findings of the commision without questioning them? We could do this all day, but it wouldn't be fun for either of us.
The Dems probably never found the smoking gun, which may be directly related to the loyalty of the CIA to the executive. This is where "falling on their swords" becomes relevant.
Last edited by cthulu23; 07-13-2004 at 08:47 PM..
|