Any Validity?
I was having a conversation earlier with a friend of mine who I consider an extreme liberal. I’m not extremely political savvy, and I was curious if there is any validity to this following statement, taken from an internet conversation talking about the reason for the Iraqi war.
"Bush Sr owns a corporation called the Carlyle Corporation, which was given a SIGNIFICANT portion of the war contracts
The Saudis own the other portion of the Carlyle Corp.
Bin Laden is a Saudi, not an Iraqi or Afghan, our government has never denied this because people don't poke their noses in far enough. Post9/11 the world was forced to freeze all alQueada assets except the Saudis, who refused
They have repeatedly killed American soldiered and harbored al Queda (and don't deny it) BUT there's the Carlyle Corp and the longstanding relationship between the Bushes and the Saudi prince, Bandhar. The Bush family even calls him Bandhar Bush. Go see F9/11, its all there, and its undeniable
there's no way Moore faked it and if he did, Bush has never even attempted to prove it, because he can't. It explains this so much more than I ever could also the pictures of the so called WMD labs were taken during the original UN inspection and Iraq later disassembled things. For example, one of the planes that the Administration told the US was practicing spraying anthrax was destroyed in 1991, just after the USSR collapsed"
Thoughts???
__________________
random
Last edited by thebeat; 07-12-2004 at 09:10 PM..
|