Quote:
Originally posted by MrSelfDestruct
.. him at 17 and David Gilmour at 82
|
HAHAHAH are you fuckin kidding me? Holy shit did they just lose a shitload of credibility... that's sad. And here I thought Rolling Stone was the last of the rock mags with some dignity.
Like I said in another thread.. the guy can play guitar enough to have a mainstream musical career, but he's nothing special. If you put him at 17, then why not the guitarist for Nickelback/Papa Roach/Staind at 18? They have about the same amount of talent.
Seriously, not to knock anyone who listens to him, but his solos are SLOPPY. Anyone could pull off the same sound by accurately hitting random frets above the 12th fret with some bends and a bit of speed. There's no feeling to them.