View Single Post
Old 07-08-2004, 11:47 AM   #45 (permalink)
DelayedReaction
BFG Builder
 
Location: University of Maryland
When it comes to freedom of speech issues, many of those things are just as hotly contested as the 2nd Amendment. Child pornography and yelling "fire!" in a theater are outlawed because they actively endanger innocent people (meaning the act itself causes harm), but obscenity laws are being contested.

People can say "fire" in certain circumstances, and not in others. The trend in terms of the 2nd Amendment is much more severe; it would be like banning use of the word fire altogether.

I agree with your key points regarding whether or not a weapon should be banned.

Quote:
What about the people that just flip out one day and start shooting people at random?
You can use the same argument to ban cars, chainsaws, axes, and a host of other items that have been used by psychopaths. Extreme situations such as that, while a valid concern, are outside the realm of the government's control. Removing a tool does not solve the problem.

Quote:
I understand that the term "assault rifle" is poorly defined. That needs to be addressed. However the 2nd Amendment is like all the other Amendments with respect to how limits may need to be placed as time and technology advances.
I agree that legislation must be used to address changing times. The problem is that much of the legislation (including the AWB) does not address changing times, it utterly violates an established right. Assault weapons are not poorly defined; the AWB provides specific descriptions. An assault weapon is defined as a semi-automatic weapon (meaning one shot per pull of the trigger) that contains specific cosmetic items such as a pistol grip on a rifle or a flash suppressor. The ban has had no effect on crime, as many of the weapons are available in other formats without the cosmetic changes. In essence our government banned weapons that look nasty.

Should children be allowed to own machine guns? Of course not. Should criminals be able to walk into Wal*Mart and buy a missile launcher? No. But law-abiding citizens should be allowed to own and purchase any small arm that they desire, and be allowed to carry that weapon (concealed or openly displayed) on public property.

If someone wants to own a gun, they should be allowed to request and obtain a license. They should need to go through proper safety training and complete demonstration (just like getting a drivers license), and register their firearms in the same manner that they register a car.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, you must be having an orgasm.
DelayedReaction is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360