Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - "Assault Weapons" Confiscation Turn Violent in Boston

The_Dunedan · 07-08-2004, 05:03 AM

See, here's the thing.
Constitutionally, there is NO SUCH THING as a "banned weapon." Doesn't exist, can't exist. Any person has the right to own any discrete weapon they chose to own, until they conclusively prove that they are evil and dangerous. This is not a right 'granted' by any Constitution, politician, or beurocrat ( sp? ); it is a Natural Right, ours by virtue simply of being human.
That being said, any Fed who tried to "confiscate" ( also known as STEAL ) one's weapons is no longer a Law Enforcement Officer. This person is now in violation of their Oath of Office and is committing a crime of violence. Therefore, any Fed who confiscates weapons is, IMO, fair game. It is no longer murder when a Citizen is defending their Freedom from attack. It is self-defense, and any Federal traitor who gets the hammer dropped on him got what he had coming.
Lest someone get the idea that I am a member of the "lunatic right;" I support the legalization of drugs and prostitution, the abolition of "victimless crime" laws, and the ouster of the entire Bush admin.
Someone will doubtless come back with some tired VPC claptrap about how "You just want to see the streets flooded with AK-47s and Uzis!" Nothing would make me happier. If average Citizens were suitably and openly armed, maybe Tom Ridge and John Ashcroft would think twice before passing/enforcing any more of the Patriot Act crap we've been flooded with for the past 3 years. If average Citizens were suitably armed, inner-city rioting such as we saw in Los Angeles ten years ago would be a thing of the past. There are countless videos and photographs of Korean shopowners successfully defending themselves and their livlihoods with "AK-47s and Uzis!!!" from roving mobs of thugs; check it out. It's quite informative.
The 2nd Amendment was written specifically to provide for armed Rebellion against a corrupt, oppressive Govornment. I cannot for the life of me understand why leftists, who are rightly upset about Ashcroft/Bush et al, don't get this concept. It was meant to allow us to protect ourselves from PEOPLE LIKE THEM!! ( Ashcroft, I mean. ) And you want us to disarm ourselves in the face of such tyranny?

07-08-2004, 05:03 AM	#26 (permalink)
The_Dunedan Junkie	See, here's the thing. Constitutionally, there is NO SUCH THING as a "banned weapon." Doesn't exist, can't exist. Any person has the right to own any discrete weapon they chose to own, until they conclusively prove that they are evil and dangerous. This is not a right 'granted' by any Constitution, politician, or beurocrat ( sp? ); it is a Natural Right, ours by virtue simply of being human. That being said, any Fed who tried to "confiscate" ( also known as STEAL ) one's weapons is no longer a Law Enforcement Officer. This person is now in violation of their Oath of Office and is committing a crime of violence. Therefore, any Fed who confiscates weapons is, IMO, fair game. It is no longer murder when a Citizen is defending their Freedom from attack. It is self-defense, and any Federal traitor who gets the hammer dropped on him got what he had coming. Lest someone get the idea that I am a member of the "lunatic right;" I support the legalization of drugs and prostitution, the abolition of "victimless crime" laws, and the ouster of the entire Bush admin. Someone will doubtless come back with some tired VPC claptrap about how "You just want to see the streets flooded with AK-47s and Uzis!" Nothing would make me happier. If average Citizens were suitably and openly armed, maybe Tom Ridge and John Ashcroft would think twice before passing/enforcing any more of the Patriot Act crap we've been flooded with for the past 3 years. If average Citizens were suitably armed, inner-city rioting such as we saw in Los Angeles ten years ago would be a thing of the past. There are countless videos and photographs of Korean shopowners successfully defending themselves and their livlihoods with "AK-47s and Uzis!!!" from roving mobs of thugs; check it out. It's quite informative. The 2nd Amendment was written specifically to provide for armed Rebellion against a corrupt, oppressive Govornment. I cannot for the life of me understand why leftists, who are rightly upset about Ashcroft/Bush et al, don't get this concept. It was meant to allow us to protect ourselves from PEOPLE LIKE THEM!! ( Ashcroft, I mean. ) And you want us to disarm ourselves in the face of such tyranny? __________________ "I personally think that America's interests would be well served if after or at the time these clowns begin their revolting little hate crime the local police come in and cart them off on some trumped up charges or other. It is necessary in my opinion that America makes an example of them to the world." --Strange Famous, advocating the use of falsified charges in order to shut people up.