Seriously, if you walk into a hospital, you see the radiation symbols everywhere..and not just near the X-ray departments
btw, exactly what constitutes a WMD facility? In my city, there is a textile factory that used to be one of the largest employers around. During WWII, they were converted over to make bombs for the war effort. After the war, they were converted back, but have the capability of becoming a bomb production plant within 3 days. Now, could that be a WMD production facility as it is right now? i'm not trying to be facetious, i just want to know what would constitute a WMD facility. Heck, within a few miles, we have a nuclear power plant..I'm sure you could easily do something with that.
I'm just curious as to what is being considered "good" and "Not good" in the eyes of, let's say, Bush, for the sake of argument.
Seriously, though, most countries have *something* radioactive and *some* way of blowing it up to make a "Dirty" bomb.
So, mark me down as "non-plussed" This is troublesome to me IF it were to fall into terrorist hands, so i'm glad it's being removed, but I dont' really see it as something to use for an argument one way or the other.
Not to mention, haven't we dropped a bit of radioactive material, depleted uranium, etc, even though the radiation from that is low?