Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - How many people here still refute WMD's in Iraq?

archer2371 · 07-06-2004, 12:40 PM

....you mean to tell me that we're still rehashing the same damn arguments as when I stopped posting here a few months ago? Look, guys, get over yourselves, all of you. wonderwench, God bless you because you're dealing with a lot of stuff that I just gave up on because I saw no point in debating with these guys, they're not going to change their minds and I doubt very seriously that you are too. All you other peoples, the bingo thing was cute for like two seconds, now it's just annoying. Can we get some facts presented here, or are we going to continue to bicker and nit pick at the language we all use?

Look, we felt we had enough credible intelligence to go into Iraq. Intelligence linking Saddam to al Qaeda (NOT for 9/11, but in general, the two are linked). Saddam had WMD at one point in time, and they were not all accounted for, and they are still unaccounted for, Bill Clinton has even said that statement. If it ends up that we don't ever find WMD that Saddam had, then fine, I'll be one of the first to decry Bush, because I will feel betrayed, I won't support Kerry, but I'll probably just end up not voting unlike I had planned on. How many of you can definitely say that there are NO WMD? If you can definitely say that, then apply for a job at the CIA, because they need the help, and you know something we don't. How many of us can definitely say that there ARE WMD? I can't, I know I can't because I'm not privy to that kind of information. However, I can say that there is a lot of evidence suggesting that Saddam had these things, and not a lot of evidence to the contrary, credible evidence anyways. I firmly believe that he had them, and had the will to use them. I will point out, as I am sure that it has before, that the Russian FSB sent it up the line to Putin that Saddam had plans for striking the United States in a form of terror. That is now three intelligence agencies, and three agencies that are of high prestige in that community (CIA, British Secret Service, and Russian FSB) that believed Saddam posed an imminent threat to the United States, and I am for one glad that we have toppled that dictator, and I believe that we are safer because of the fall of the dictatorial regime. There, that's the facts that I would like to point out, because I feel that there needed to be a refocus on this topic, it was getting out of hand.

07-06-2004, 12:40 PM	#170 (permalink)
archer2371 Sarge of Blood Gulch Red Outpost Number One Location: On the front lines against our very enemy	....you mean to tell me that we're still rehashing the same damn arguments as when I stopped posting here a few months ago? Look, guys, get over yourselves, all of you. wonderwench, God bless you because you're dealing with a lot of stuff that I just gave up on because I saw no point in debating with these guys, they're not going to change their minds and I doubt very seriously that you are too. All you other peoples, the bingo thing was cute for like two seconds, now it's just annoying. Can we get some facts presented here, or are we going to continue to bicker and nit pick at the language we all use? Look, we felt we had enough credible intelligence to go into Iraq. Intelligence linking Saddam to al Qaeda (NOT for 9/11, but in general, the two are linked). Saddam had WMD at one point in time, and they were not all accounted for, and they are still unaccounted for, Bill Clinton has even said that statement. If it ends up that we don't ever find WMD that Saddam had, then fine, I'll be one of the first to decry Bush, because I will feel betrayed, I won't support Kerry, but I'll probably just end up not voting unlike I had planned on. How many of you can definitely say that there are NO WMD? If you can definitely say that, then apply for a job at the CIA, because they need the help, and you know something we don't. How many of us can definitely say that there ARE WMD? I can't, I know I can't because I'm not privy to that kind of information. However, I can say that there is a lot of evidence suggesting that Saddam had these things, and not a lot of evidence to the contrary, credible evidence anyways. I firmly believe that he had them, and had the will to use them. I will point out, as I am sure that it has before, that the Russian FSB sent it up the line to Putin that Saddam had plans for striking the United States in a form of terror. That is now three intelligence agencies, and three agencies that are of high prestige in that community (CIA, British Secret Service, and Russian FSB) that believed Saddam posed an imminent threat to the United States, and I am for one glad that we have toppled that dictator, and I believe that we are safer because of the fall of the dictatorial regime. There, that's the facts that I would like to point out, because I feel that there needed to be a refocus on this topic, it was getting out of hand. __________________ "This ain't no Ice Cream Social!" "Hey Grif, Chupathingy...how bout that? I like it...got a ring to it." "I have no earthly idea what it is I just saw, or what this place is, or where in the hell O'Malley is! My only choice is to blame Grif for coming up with such a flawed plan. Stupid, stupid Grif." Last edited by archer2371; 07-06-2004 at 12:43 PM..