Quote:
Originally posted by wonderwench
That depends upon how one defines a direct attack. If one defines it in terms of launching ICBMs - then False. If one defines it as using a terrorist network to deploy chemical and biological agents - then True.
|
I've never seen evidence to back this up.
Quote:
False - The justification for war never included a direct collaboration between OBL and SAdam.
|
But the connection was used to sway the opinions of the American people.
Quote:
Indeterminate and not relevant. The issue was complete compliance with the UN resolutions - for which Saddam has been proven to be in violation.
|
And we respect the sanctity of UN opinion so much that we invaded over it's objections. I consider the UN resolution argument meaningless because of this obvious disconnect.
Quote:
True. The front line for the War Declared Upon Western Civilization by Islamofascists has been moved back to the Mid-East.
|
This "flypaper theory," popularized by Andrew Sullivan, only works if there is a finite amount of Islamic terrorists. Given that the invasion of a Middle Eastern country will undoubtedly create new extremists, this value of this idea is null.