Quote:
Originally posted by roachboy
remarkable.
look, the problem was not whether in general hussein had weapon systems--it was whether bushclaims about the status of those systems were true at the point when the americans decided to go outside the un process and declare a functionally unilateral pre-emptive war.
the coalition is itself a questionable entity--but that is a different issue. if you actually read the ny times article, it says clearly that the americans in general knew that the un claims about the wmd systems were correct--they are trying now to argue that the information got bottled up with the cia.
i do not see where this is even a subject open to argument any longer.
it does not bode well for bushworld, this information, but there is no point in pretending that it does not exist.
"mideval barbarians"....."islamofascism"????...wtf???
|
I'm surprised at your last comment. Given that you are an historian, I would have thought you would understand that Islamic Civilization has declined greatly over the past few centuries. Comparing themselves to the West's ascendency is one of the drivers in the terrorist movement.
It is Islamofascism. They wish to subordinate the world to an Islamic state in which individuals have no rights.