Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - How many people here still refute WMD's in Iraq?

matteo101 · 07-05-2004, 10:36 AM

It is quite obvious to me that after september 11, Bush thought to himself..hmm what can I do to benefit from all these people that lost their lives, how can this travecty help me out. With america in shambles, he had everyone at his fingertips. He told the people that terrorists were plotting against us, and to always be cautious. He raised terror alerts to orange, and red, back to orange, down to yellow, and back up again. He was basically scaring this shit out of us. He knew that the people would trust almost anything he did, IF they thought it would help them, help them to be a safer country, help them to get rid of the fear, the fear that was given to them by the government themselfs.
So Bush announced they were going to invade iraq. They were going to invade them to find "weapons of mass destruction, to find chemical and biological weapons"...oh and to umm "help the people, from there opressed government..yeah thats right".
The people of course heard the word weapons of mass destruction and immidiatly thought, yah, we need to get allllll the weapons of mass destruction, hell send all our troops there, weapons of mass destruction can only lead to us getting nuked in the near future...please go in there, spare anything...just help us
So they did, he sent in thousands of troops, and so the war was started: They bombed palaces..missed a couple times..killed thousands of civilians yada yada yada...864 american troups were killed...yada yada yada...and oh umm no weapons of mass destruction, no chemical weapons, no biological weapons..but look what they did do, we got rid of sadaam and saved the people from the opressed government. Yes, they did do that...they now figured since we did do that, half america will think it is still justifyable, I mean we did help that nations people....we have to think though, there are so many countries with that same situations...even there good friends the saudis..but god forbid they would ever invade them...heh, them with there 17 percent of all money in the United States, no we would never invade them...but iraq, they are justifable, they do have the second largest oil reserves...and none of it is even ours...but if we can "invade" them, take away there government, put in our own "government" I think it might be a little easier to get this oil...yes, they can get lots of oil. Hell it costed us hundreds of troups, hundreds of civilians, many many lies to the american people..but in the end the oil is all ours.

Sorry for the book, but I just had to get afew things off my chest...

Edit: This is my own personal opinions..

07-05-2004, 10:36 AM	#79 (permalink)
matteo101 In transition Location: north, no south abit, over to the right, getting warmer...there!	It is quite obvious to me that after september 11, Bush thought to himself..hmm what can I do to benefit from all these people that lost their lives, how can this travecty help me out. With america in shambles, he had everyone at his fingertips. He told the people that terrorists were plotting against us, and to always be cautious. He raised terror alerts to orange, and red, back to orange, down to yellow, and back up again. He was basically scaring this shit out of us. He knew that the people would trust almost anything he did, IF they thought it would help them, help them to be a safer country, help them to get rid of the fear, the fear that was given to them by the government themselfs. So Bush announced they were going to invade iraq. They were going to invade them to find "weapons of mass destruction, to find chemical and biological weapons"...oh and to umm "help the people, from there opressed government..yeah thats right". The people of course heard the word weapons of mass destruction and immidiatly thought, yah, we need to get allllll the weapons of mass destruction, hell send all our troops there, weapons of mass destruction can only lead to us getting nuked in the near future...please go in there, spare anything...just help us So they did, he sent in thousands of troops, and so the war was started: They bombed palaces..missed a couple times..killed thousands of civilians yada yada yada...864 american troups were killed...yada yada yada...and oh umm no weapons of mass destruction, no chemical weapons, no biological weapons..but look what they did do, we got rid of sadaam and saved the people from the opressed government. Yes, they did do that...they now figured since we did do that, half america will think it is still justifyable, I mean we did help that nations people....we have to think though, there are so many countries with that same situations...even there good friends the saudis..but god forbid they would ever invade them...heh, them with there 17 percent of all money in the United States, no we would never invade them...but iraq, they are justifable, they do have the second largest oil reserves...and none of it is even ours...but if we can "invade" them, take away there government, put in our own "government" I think it might be a little easier to get this oil...yes, they can get lots of oil. Hell it costed us hundreds of troups, hundreds of civilians, many many lies to the american people..but in the end the oil is all ours. Sorry for the book, but I just had to get afew things off my chest... Edit: This is my own personal opinions.. Last edited by matteo101; 07-05-2004 at 11:21 AM..