Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - This was the old evolution thread, go to the new thread to post

Macheath · 05-06-2003, 06:35 PM

raeanna74, the examples I provided in a previous post were speciation events, instances where the organisms were classified a different species from their ancestor. This is NOT a simple microevolution within a species - it is macroevolution. Two tests used for speciation in taxonomy are inability to breed with ancestor species and morphology.

I will post the link again.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html

Archaeopteryx is not a hoax. Those claims have been refuted.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/arch...x/forgery.html

[sarcasm]
Personally I hate those physicists who go around preaching relativity which is not a fact but just a theory. Gravity on the other hand is not just a good idea, it's the law.

How did Karl Popper think he was going to win over a flock with all of that vacillating falsifiability nonsense.[/sarcasm]

05-06-2003, 06:35 PM	#71 (permalink)
Macheath Junkie Location: Sydney, Australia	raeanna74, the examples I provided in a previous post were speciation events, instances where the organisms were classified a different species from their ancestor. This is NOT a simple microevolution within a species - it is macroevolution. Two tests used for speciation in taxonomy are inability to breed with ancestor species and morphology. I will post the link again. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html Archaeopteryx is not a hoax. Those claims have been refuted. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/arch...x/forgery.html [sarcasm] Personally I hate those physicists who go around preaching relativity which is not a fact but just a theory. Gravity on the other hand is not just a good idea, it's the law. How did Karl Popper think he was going to win over a flock with all of that vacillating falsifiability nonsense.[/sarcasm]