Shakran, I take it you're the proof of my interpretation of the anti-war position.
How are these "two old, dead weapons" *not* prove that Saddam had WMDs? It's not a gray scale thing we're talking about, it's an Either-Or situation: either he had them, or he had none. IF these weapons are shown to belong to the Saddam-era Iraqi army, it proves that he did have WMDs.
Now, does this prove that he had a *substantial amount* of WMDs before the last war? No, it does not. That cannot be proven with isolated discoveries of long-lost weapons.