Quote:
Originally posted by analog
I've not seen it shown that that is the law. So, show me where it specifically states there is a law against people who already have gun permits in that state to show at a public rally on public land, and we won't have a problem.
|
Apparently, the city of Columbus felt that the organizers of the rally were within their rights restricting admission as they did. They then sent the PPs packing (pun intended).
Quote:
|
If there is a specific law that prevented them from doing so, and no one brought it up until just now, then I have argued with people who don't even know what the hell they're arguing about. Sometimes, though, that's par for the course.
|
Is it better, worse or equivalent to argue for something that you know nothing about rather than against it? Regardless, the pasted article that began this thread neglected to bring up that SC was within their rights to restrict admission. The people that you are arguing with are the only ones that bothered to check the facts. Is this also "par for the course?"
Quote:
Um. No, I (or any of the other staff) will not be locking the thread. One odd comment will not get a thread locked.
Second of all...
...is not calling anyone ignorant. I didn't say, "you're ignorant". I said "ignorance of the law...". Saying "ignorance of ______" simply means not knowing about it. I was also not speaking to anyone in particular, especially since i said, "for some people". "Some people" makes it plural, as in more than one, so it was not directed at anyone.
|
I understand the subtleties of the phrasing. The intent is clear.