Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

cthulu23 · 06-30-2004, 07:03 AM

I'm having a parallel debate in another thread so I won't paste the sme quote, but here is a link instead...
http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_b...0406280912.asp

Synopsis: because of current economic conditions, tax increases are inevitable. Note that the source is the National Review.

I agree that government is wasteful, but I suspect that we would prioritize needs a little differently.

Greenspan is ALWAYS for tax cuts....he favors off-setting Bush's cuts by cutting social security, which fits into his philosophical belief that all charity is harmful. If we follow supply-side logic to it's end, we find a country where only the poor are taxed and only the wages of the rich are increased. That doesn't seem very fair, does it?

06-30-2004, 07:03 AM	#16 (permalink)
cthulu23 Banned	I'm having a parallel debate in another thread so I won't paste the sme quote, but here is a link instead... http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_b...0406280912.asp Synopsis: because of current economic conditions, tax increases are inevitable. Note that the source is the National Review. I agree that government is wasteful, but I suspect that we would prioritize needs a little differently. Greenspan is ALWAYS for tax cuts....he favors off-setting Bush's cuts by cutting social security, which fits into his philosophical belief that all charity is harmful. If we follow supply-side logic to it's end, we find a country where only the poor are taxed and only the wages of the rich are increased. That doesn't seem very fair, does it?