|
I don't think Bush needs any help in showing himself in an unfavorable light.
As for this title issue... I fail to see how this is even an issue. It'd be one thing if Bradbury - or someone else - owned the trademark to the name. Then you could argue that someone's toes are being stepped on.
But talking about an artist's intellectual property? In this context, I don't see the point. Would the book be less good with a different title?
Plagiarizing someone's actual work, such as creating a parody of the whole book, would be one thing...but borrowing a title that is nothing but a temperature reading anyway... What a catastrophe.
Perhaps Moore has ties to al-Qaeda.
__________________
Who is John Galt?
|