Quote:
Originally posted by hannukah harry
actually, i finally did a search two days ago on upright rows, found one site saying they were bad, and not quite for the reason coash listed (although that was a lesser reason mentioned), it was the only site in the top 5 to mention this.
|
yeah? what site was this and where exactly did you search? how is their reason different from mine?
Quote:
|
as you can see, i'm not the only one who recommended them (just to show that the general common knowledge is that they're okay, most people don't realize otherwise).
|
over and over..
Quote:
|
i wasn't going to bother posting anything about this, i was going to wait and let coash back himself up. my feelings are if you've never posted in here before, we don't know if you anything or not, so if you want to say something that seems to widely differ from the general opinion, show some kind of proof. to say "biomechanically speaking..." like he did doesn't back it up, because he could still have been wrong. i like proof, which he said he would give and didn't, that's all it takes for me to say i'm wrong...
|
too funny. how does me not posting in this forum before mean that I'm wrong and the general opinion here is the correct one?
I already backed up the reasons describing the musculoskeletal properties behind it. if you don't understand you can ask.
You on the other hand are contradicting yourself. You say you like proof, yet you haven't given a scientific reason other than saying:
"Oh this is what the general opinion is so you must be wrong"
Seems like you have no relevent points to make at this stage, even in the beginning for that matter. There must be something in your undergrad degree that is relevent?