Quote:
Originally posted by ubertuber
Someone else already pointed out that Shakespeare is publie domain, and Bradbury is certainly not. I'd be willing to bet that Bradbury, if he wanted, could STOMP Moore in court. Our Napster culture notwithstanding, courts have been very supportive of artists intellectual property, and there is no doubt that the only way that Moore's title even COULD make sense is by standing on Bradbury's shoulders. That calls for recognition, permission, and if asked, royalties.
|
I second this thought fully.
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act, but a habit."
--Aristotle
|