View Single Post
Old 06-21-2004, 07:00 PM   #23 (permalink)
nanofever
Huzzah for Welcome Week, Much beer shall I imbibe.
 
Location: UCSB
Quote:
Originally posted by Hwed
cthulu, I'd ask for some of what you're smoking, but if it's going to make me that gloomy, I'll pass.

Against it. Minimum wage is a completely arbitrary number. If you increase it, markets quickly adjust to compensate and return everything to equilibrium, with the exception of some irreversible inflation, the weakening of the dollar in international currency markets, and a likely bump in interest rates.

If you want to improve quality of life, you need to increase the demand for goods and services produced by workers across the spectrum. Encouraging investment and allowing people to keep more of their money is a good start.

People gripe about tax cuts for the rich (if you define rich as a married couple making $100k a year, like the Democrats do), but the fact is that excess wealth in the hands of the upper 50% does a tremendous amount to stimulate and grow the economy in the long term.

If a low-end wage earner is given more disposable income, that worker is very likely to spend most of it on consumable goods. No new investment, no new jobs.

On the other hand, middle- and upper-class workers will spend excess disposable income on two things: consumables AND investment. This newly spurred investment funds new business opportunities, creating jobs and giving those low end workers a chance to move up the scale.

John Kerry is an airhead, not to mention a gigolo who has never worked a day in his life, marrying wealth to live a life of privilege.. He pays $1000 for a haircut. This man is so disconnected from people who work hard for a living it's sad.
Weeee, that same logic was used in the past to pay workers just enough to keep them alive. The Iron Law of Wages is an attempt to keep workers in the depths of poverty, and to give those who control the means of production a permanent lock on wealth. Increased consumer spending drives the market. (notice the period at the end of that sentence) If you pay the poor higher real wages, they can consume more and investment and new job will happen. On that note, supply-side economics are a horrible joke on the poor by the wealthy.
__________________
I'm leaving for the University of California: Santa Barbara in 5 hours, give me your best college advice - things I need, good ideas, bad ideas, nooky, ect.

Originally Posted by Norseman on another forum:
"Yeah, the problem with the world is the stupid people are all cocksure of themselves and the intellectuals are full of doubt."

Last edited by nanofever; 06-21-2004 at 07:15 PM..
nanofever is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360