One of the problems with the author's statement that we should "back up our argument with facts," is that there really can't be much factual evidence that supports abuses of the PA. If the abuse is done in secrecy, and everyone involved is under a gag order, how can the average citizen possibly be privy to any information pertaining to the abuse?
It is obvious that special measures need to be taken to apprehend terrorists, and I accept that. But the law must be constructed in such a manner as to ensure that there is no possibility of abuse.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, you must be having an orgasm.
|