|
i would be interested to see what, if any, methodologies you might be using to disagree, art.
or is your disagreement a function of premises that you import into the situation and which are not amenable to argument?
if the latter, then there really is no point in conversation, because you have decided the matter before any work has occurred and are not willing to submit your position to debate out of fear that it might be falsified.
in which case you are obviously free to say when and where you like that you have the vague sense that "the media" does not function as you would like, but these statements are about your aesthetic, not an object in the world.
btw i think that the chomsky model simplifies things by making a too-easy link between the fact of ownership and the content of ideology---but this is a different conversation....
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|