What's clear here is the refusal to accept the strong evidence that an overwhelming number of journalists label themselves "liberal" when compared to any other label.
What's moot is whether they are objective or not, given that bias.
Objectivity is a judgement call. We can debate that unverifiable subject forever and never come to a conclusion. I'm aware that endless debate on things is considered a fine and dandy way to proceed by some.
It does seem to me however that if journalists were in some way "objective" they would be classifying themselves as "non-partisan."
All these quotes out of context make for colorful posts.
__________________
create evolution
|