|
Couldn't agree with you more KnifeMissle. Those are all my points exactly. It just seems that not enough was done to prove this guy was innocent. Everything was done to prove him guilty. Now is this just because the writer decided to write the article this way to make us sustain our disbelief or is this what gist of the story really is?
*generalization*
So, should I be bent on not trusting our legal system or bent on the way journalism misleads?
__________________
Doh!!!!
-Homer Simpson
|