|
well, matteo, some of the factors I mentioned are not competition factors. You can't compete on hard numbers such as safety ratings, milage, emissions, price/value, and owner satisfaction polls. All of which the TL excells at.
Anyways, bad30th, your paranoia about people agreeing with me simply because I'm 'the boss' is funny. Why is it funny? Because that's what EVERYONE who disagrees with me says. It's a convenient little support to lean on when your own arguments aren't cutting it, isn't it? Get over it. I possess logic that people can agree with and that's why I am 'the boss' in the first place.
So, what's trash? Trash is someone who lacks in some areas and overcompensates in others. Hence - easily affordable muscle. I wasn't blanketing everyone who owns a muscle car to be trash, but I was observing that most of them that I do see - ARE. I'll always appreciate a well-kept car, but Mustangs and the such are a dime a dozen. While I can see how such a car could be the pinnacle of someone's automotive expectations, it is far more likely that even though they could afford a nice, reliable, safe and sensible Accord for the same money, they got the Mustang because it hauls more ass. And that's about all it does.
BTW, that little bit about the conjectures - PURELY meant to get a rise out of you. Guilty.
|