Quote:
Originally posted by DelayedReaction
Could that statement be any more ambiguous? Yes, reducing access to milspec weaponry prevents general populace from owning it. But you can't possibly make a justification that because banning grenade launchers is effective we should start banning handguns.
|
If you look at my posts earlier in this thread, you'll see that I don't advocate the seizure of American firearms. I was simply pointing out how the NRA's "if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns" syllogism falls apart if subjected to scrutiny. Doesn't the limited availability of many high-power weapons confirm this?