Quote:
Originally posted by boatin
Everyone should have the right to disagree, and the administration should be able to listen to all sides and judge thoughts/opinions/disagreement on merits. Not blindly react with negativity.
[/B]
|
His point (and it's one that I agree with) is that there is no room to disagree over the fact that terrorism is unacceptable. It is not acceptable to target innocent civilians. It is not acceptable to stand idly by while others do so. It is especially not acceptable to enable those who wish to kill innocents. Terrorism stands in direct opposition to civilization.
There is no room for "well terrorism is ok in this situation". There's no "understanding" to be given to those who choose this path. This isn't some theoretical discussion about how everyone's opinion should count and hold validity. Those who believe in terrorism should not be accepted in world society. That is the essence of the message.
Feel free to disagree with the ways to fight terrorism since there is no suitable method that all could agree on, but don't for a second think that terrorism should be sanctioned either through direct support or inaction.