platypus

What if there's another angle here? <b>Genetics</b>

If genetic material carries the code for everything from one's hair color to the size of one's feet, why not also for sexual orientation?

It's the old argument of Nature vs. Nurture, but...

What if the FDA - or more likely some uber-conservatives within the FDA - believe that we are genetically predisposed to our sexual orientation? Would they care if the material collected contained the genetic imprint for a sexual orientation that goes against their own personal prejudices? Could it follow that they, for lack of a better term, don't want "gay" sperm in the mix?

This would be a concern not addressed by the ambiguous "unprotected sex" question.


Edit: Not that I agree with their line of questions. No flame please, just supposing here.

__________________
Out the 10Base-T, through the router, down the T1, over the leased line, off the bridge, past the firewall...nothing but Net.