|
I actually voted yes. Why? Well a few people already mentioned some of my points being that perhaps some of the viewers were under 18 - thus should have required a parental permission to watch "NC-17" material. However, my big point supporting his suspension is that he did it on school time. I don't believe this material should be shown in high school class. Had he shown it after or before school, I don't think I would have supported his suspension. By showing the video on school time he was basically implying he had the administration's approval to show it - which is the main reason, I believe, he got in trouble.
__________________
"Don't cry because it's over. Smile because it happened." - Dr. Seuss
|