you entire argument is based upon the presupposition that i condone/justify the US's actions... i roundly deny that. i won't address you or mehoni's "point" because they aren't points. they're built on what you wanted me to say, not what i said.
it is entirely reasonable to condemn two separate actions... yet consider one of those to be much worse than the other. i was clearly responding to posters equivocating the two.
i've clearly been characterized as someone who condones torture of human beings, letting dog's loose on prisoner's and that i might think torture is fine as long as the faces aren't shown. where i come from, that necessitates an apology rather than a rebuttal.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
~ Winston Churchill
|