Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

ConsoleMaster · 05-11-2004, 04:41 PM

RlS, Statistics can be misleading when given the population density of 2 billion Chinese men and 1000 asian men.

1,000/2,000,000,000 is like almost 0.000005 or 0.0005 % of Asia population. I find that very amusing. But, if given a city-wide area anaylsis of the statistics, it would be more legit because of Dwarnism theory of closed variation. The gene pool will be limited because of the closed state of the variation in the popluation. This reasoning is a part of the reasons within reasons.

"The truth is does not reveal the truth. Just like when you place a bird on a paper, and a cage on another paper. How would you get the bird in the paper without drawing a bird in the cage? Simple, place the bird behind the cage drawing, and rotate it rapidly between two strings. You'll get the bird in the cage. "

It seemss that stats applies well if you reach a critical number such as flipping a coin and expected to recieve 1/2 chance of heads or tails. If you do this a couple of times if may be only 0.03% of reaching that, however, if you do it for a long length of flippings it may approach the more theoretical of 0.5. One of the reasons statistics in population may have a dramatic error. It's good for marketing schemes though.

Note: In case you want to know where I get the 1,000 from. It's from the link that you given me.

Nonetheless, it's hard to give a number to humans. We don't know how to use it. LOL.

05-11-2004, 04:41 PM	#21 (permalink)
ConsoleMaster Upright	RlS, Statistics can be misleading when given the population density of 2 billion Chinese men and 1000 asian men. 1,000/2,000,000,000 is like almost 0.000005 or 0.0005 % of Asia population. I find that very amusing. But, if given a city-wide area anaylsis of the statistics, it would be more legit because of Dwarnism theory of closed variation. The gene pool will be limited because of the closed state of the variation in the popluation. This reasoning is a part of the reasons within reasons. "The truth is does not reveal the truth. Just like when you place a bird on a paper, and a cage on another paper. How would you get the bird in the paper without drawing a bird in the cage? Simple, place the bird behind the cage drawing, and rotate it rapidly between two strings. You'll get the bird in the cage. " It seemss that stats applies well if you reach a critical number such as flipping a coin and expected to recieve 1/2 chance of heads or tails. If you do this a couple of times if may be only 0.03% of reaching that, however, if you do it for a long length of flippings it may approach the more theoretical of 0.5. One of the reasons statistics in population may have a dramatic error. It's good for marketing schemes though. Note: In case you want to know where I get the 1,000 from. It's from the link that you given me. Nonetheless, it's hard to give a number to humans. We don't know how to use it. LOL. Last edited by ConsoleMaster; 05-11-2004 at 04:49 PM..