Quote:
|
... I would never ever regret taking it if I was able to do the things I just described.
|
Notice I say if. "IF it were able to do those things." Alcohol would not enable me to do those things, and I think the fact that I would not have my last moment with my father drunk is just kind of assumed. My point by saying what I said originally is that experience on MDMA is not "fake". I don't even know what your point is.
Quote:
|
And don't give me that crap about molecules behaving differently in different matters and double standard. :
|
You are correct I did miss your point.
Quote:
|
The thing about salt was a point about molecules which contain other molecules or atoms not acting like the molecules that they contain do on their own.
|
That was my point. Nothing else. Nothing about double standard there. I don't even know why you chose to respond to it when you have no idea why I was saying it. It might be my fault you have no idea, but you shouldn't respond if you don't. Someone said that he didn't want to take MDMA because MA is meth. I was just saying that just because a molecule-A contains molecule-B doesn't mean A acts exactly like B. I used salt as an example of a molecule-A(salt) not acting like a molecule-B(chloride) which it contains.
Quote:
|
You are talking about 2 drugs, admittedly, different drugs. They both however radically change something in your system for no real good reason other than leisure... And leave you with after-effects that at best can be described as undesirable.
|
#1. I have never taken MDMA.
#2. I did not say ever that taking MDMA was better than taking PCP. I explicitly said that in my first response to you. I said: "thinking you can fly is moronic"
Subject is Adjective. The adjective describes the subject, not something else that you just decide it is going to describe.
I believe your confusion arose from me saying that if I chose - which I HAVE NOT - to say that taking PCP is worse than taking mdma, it would not be a double standard, because they are two completely different substances, and just because they are taken for the same reasons and have "similar" effects does not mean they are the same. Maybe my cyanide and water example was a bit to extreme, it wasn't meant to be an exact analogy, rather an exaggeration so my point would be exaggerated to a level at which it would be easily understood. Here is another example. Tylenol and Oxycontin are both used to relieve pain. If you chew up 10 tylenol, you're pretty stupid, but if you chew up 10 oc, you're alot dumber. Two different substances, two different standard for decided how stupid a person is based on their taking of each substance.