maleficent

There are a lot of people out there who couldn't afford to have children, yet they did anyhow, and most of those kids turned out ok (Least I think I did) You make it work, you might not have brand new sneakers every year, you might not have brand new clothes every year, you might not have filet mignon for dinner every night, but you make it work. (my parents, at no point, ever accepted welfare, they just cut back)

These people's financial standing have no business being part of this case, and that's where I am drawing my objections. because if it's OK for these two, then you have a precendent set, it will make it ok for any other couple.

No matter what, taxpayers are on the hook for these kids, foster care? Bullshit, the parents lose the children. Foster care is a temporary solution to a permenant problem. These people should never be able to get their children back, that way, I'm not paying for them. If the parents love their children, and I question it in this case, they'd agree because they'd want what is best for the children.

__________________