Quote:
Originally posted by sexymama
First, I don't read that the judge said to this couple no sex -- he/she said no more children!
We have a lot of sick people in our society: rich, poor and middle class. None of whom, imho, should be allowed to have children. But we have a free society that allows us to procreate at will. Yet, we must have licenses to carry guns (despite the first amendment), to drive a car, etc. I'm not saying we should give out licenses to procreate -- I'm just saying there must be a better way! I'm not sure what it is -- just know it must be out there somewhere. Hmmm????
|
Well, the people must be disarmed, the first amendment causes 9,000 deaths a year, but I dont really see how it is relevant to this issue.
And the choice is pretty stark,,, either people are free to make love and reproduce, or you have state sponsored sterilisation, that is the choice - that is the reality, mass sterlisation of the socially disadvantaged, or a social welfare system.
The tax argument is illogical to me, I think many people dont understand... the purpose of tax is the redistribution of wealth, the purpose of tax is to take from the rich and give to the poor... social services is the means of taxastion, not the end of it.
We have tax to take money that the rich exploit and return it to the working class people.