Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - A state representative in Lousiana is upset about all the underwear he's seeing.....

Drider_it · 05-07-2004, 02:32 PM

OMG could the fucktards that run my state actually have a better time trying to pass laws that need to be passed.. like getting the fuckers that drink and drive off the roads and such.. but no.. this bastard is more opt to stop fashion trends.

A state representative in Lousiana is upset about all the underwear he's seeing due to low-riding pants. Now he's going to do something about it.

From The Associated Press:

People who wear low-slung pants that expose skin or "intimate clothing" would face a fine of up to $500 and possible jail time under a bill filed by a Jefferson Parish lawmaker.

State Rep. Derrick Shepherd said he filed the bill because he was tired of catching glimpses of boxer shorts and G-strings over the lowered belt lines of young adults.

The bill would punish anyone caught wearing low-riding pants with a fine of as much as $500 or as many as six months in jail, or both.

"I'm sick of seeing it," said Shepherd, a first-term legislator. "The community's outraged. And if parents can't do their job, if parents can't regulate what their children wear, then there should be a law."

Ever see a little more of a guy's crack

then you wanted to when he bent over? Not a pleasant site, but it happens right? Heck, we even make jokes about it. "Plumber's crack" is what we call it here in North Dakota.

But should such exposures really be misdemeanor offenses? Is this representative really trying to pass a law that could put somebody in jail for not wearing a belt?

I understand his point about seeing the boxer shorts and g-strings. For a lot of kids these days, that's the fad. That's the style. They let their underwear show. I'm a little tired of seeing 12 and 13 year-old girls in the mall with their underwear hanging out of their pants. I think its disgusting. But I also don't think its cause for a law.

http://sayanythingblog.com/archives/001401.php

oh and this one from our local tv station

http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp...8&nav=0RY5MwpW

05-07-2004, 02:32 PM	#1 (permalink)
Drider_it Junkie Location: Louisiana	A state representative in Lousiana is upset about all the underwear he's seeing..... OMG could the fucktards that run my state actually have a better time trying to pass laws that need to be passed.. like getting the fuckers that drink and drive off the roads and such.. but no.. this bastard is more opt to stop fashion trends. A state representative in Lousiana is upset about all the underwear he's seeing due to low-riding pants. Now he's going to do something about it. From The Associated Press: People who wear low-slung pants that expose skin or "intimate clothing" would face a fine of up to $500 and possible jail time under a bill filed by a Jefferson Parish lawmaker. State Rep. Derrick Shepherd said he filed the bill because he was tired of catching glimpses of boxer shorts and G-strings over the lowered belt lines of young adults. The bill would punish anyone caught wearing low-riding pants with a fine of as much as $500 or as many as six months in jail, or both. "I'm sick of seeing it," said Shepherd, a first-term legislator. "The community's outraged. And if parents can't do their job, if parents can't regulate what their children wear, then there should be a law." Ever see a little more of a guy's crack then you wanted to when he bent over? Not a pleasant site, but it happens right? Heck, we even make jokes about it. "Plumber's crack" is what we call it here in North Dakota. But should such exposures really be misdemeanor offenses? Is this representative really trying to pass a law that could put somebody in jail for not wearing a belt? I understand his point about seeing the boxer shorts and g-strings. For a lot of kids these days, that's the fad. That's the style. They let their underwear show. I'm a little tired of seeing 12 and 13 year-old girls in the mall with their underwear hanging out of their pants. I think its disgusting. But I also don't think its cause for a law. http://sayanythingblog.com/archives/001401.php oh and this one from our local tv station http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp...8&nav=0RY5MwpW __________________ It means only one thing, and everything: Cut. Once committed to fight, Cut. Everything else is secondary. Cut. That is your duty, your purpose, your hunger. There is no rule more important, no commitment that overrides that one. Cut. The lines are a portrayal of the dance. Cut from the void, not from bewilderment. Cut the enemy as quickly and directly as possible. Cut with certainty. Cut decisively, resoultely. Cut into his strength. Flow through the gaps in his guard. Cut him. Cut him down utterly. Don't allow him a breath. Crush him. Cut him without mercy to the depth of his spirit. It is the balance to life: death. It is the dance with death. It is the law a war wizard lives by, or he dies. Last edited by Drider_it; 05-07-2004 at 02:42 PM..