Okay....back on topic, again.
I think what you are actually describing is Ideology in general. If someone is against needless killing of innocent people, they will likely go with a party that is not in support of such. The underlying belief structure of any one person, will send them in one direction or another, in hopes of bringing the rest of the population around to their way of thinking. Also , the level of personal experience and the extent to which any issue effects the world will define the attitudes of many.
Example:
I find killing to be disgusting, and rarely find it justified.
I find corruption in government everywhere I look.
I dislike the current state of healthcare in this country.
I am not a Democrat.
I accept that government must control parts of the population.
I think Gun ownership is acceptable.
I will stand behind my country in war.
I am not a republican
I honestly think it is an erronous generalization to place people in a party because of the way they think, but if it helps to simplify an extremely complicated process, so be it.
By the way.....My post was not an attack on you, merely an attempt to get back on a good topic. But, it seems we would all rather argue over wht is a religious issue at heart. The scientific data pertains to the timing and attributes that define a human being, and the likely level of sentience a fetus can show during gestation. This information is well documented, and is used to back up the roe v. wade descision. Should you require the Data, I will happily research it and post it for you.
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
|