|
holo: i'm not sure how you can justify putting people's lives at risk for the sake of your enhanced fantasy life. I think that the porn consumer should be willing to allow their favorite actors and actresses to protect themselves. as things stand now girls* are paid *more* for shooting without a condom a practice that may be financially lucrative but that is essentially asking an actress to put a price on the value of being healthy. i don't think that's sexy.
*i assume this increased payment is directed towards the women because women are more likely than men to contract HIV from heterosexual sex.
|