|
My point was I think being raised in the military, and currently serving myself, I think I know a little more about what goes on than someone who reads radical publications which rely on statistics that have no validity.
I didnt simply dismiss this guy, I read everything he had to say, and tore his argument to pieces. There is a difference, it is like expecting people to agree with neo-nazis because they can spew out a few statistics which simply dont add up.
nanofever, read any books on the post-WWII period. Thats the sources I used in a 15 page report less than a year ago, I dont feel like pulling them back up atm.
zeld my point was they face almost the exact same geopolitical and economic problems, I dont see much of a difference besides location and religion.
|