i agree that it is misleading for the ads to imply that kerry deliberately voted against these systems by themselves.
but...
the article cites these instances as evidence that kerry isn't as weak on defense as the ads would have you believe. not necessarily true.
so kerry didn't specifically vote against the equipment? fine. but it doesn't make it any better that he voted against the equipment plus everything else the bill was intended to support.
sure, it reveals a potentially misleading part of the ad... but it does nothing to disprove the idea that kerry's record on defense spending hasn't been adequate.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
~ Winston Churchill
|