Quote:
Originally posted by ARTelevision
Yes, thanks for the personal viewpoint, Holo.
I used the term "political viability" in order to discuss the way these things get implemented as matters of public policy.
I read your view to be that there should be no public policy matter at issue here. Political realities do seem to indicate that some public pollicy will always exist as regards a society in which both minors and adults can inhabit the same community spaces.
|
There should be a moral policy that is decided upon by the individual parents, not a political one. The government doesn't need to be doing our job as parents, and certainly doesn't need to be policing consenting, informed adults. Perhaps the public policy should be to prosecute those who expose children to content deemed unacceptable to their parents similar to the statutory rape laws. If the parents don't turn your daughter's bf in for fucking her at 16 when they catch them in flagrante delicto and they aren't found by an LEA officer, then he doesn't get charged with SR. Same with content offenses. If a parent find out Janie went over to and watched The Crow at Kristi's house and they informed the parent's that R rated films were unacceptable content then they can use the public policy to bring action again those parents. Otherwise, it's all good.
__________________
I happen to like the words "fuck", "cock", "pussy", "tits", "cunt", "twat", "shit" and even "bitch". As long as I am not using them to describe you, don't go telling me whether or not I can/should use them...that is, if you want me to continue refraining from using them to describe you. ~Prince
|