|
yes, this is the challenge of the unbelief or to agnostic, unorganized belief :P . well, by analyzing arguments of religious text, you can often find problems in the logic as in any arguments as people live on different fundemental assumption. and if these assumption happen to be incompatible, i believe it is actually quite easy to be a non-believer. plus even by compromising with these assupmtions, one still might find the lack of the "leap of faith" required to believe in a omnipotent God. For example Deist of the enlightenment period who are hardcore empericist believe in God by the argument of design and as many of you know, the famous Pascal's "Wager". yet they refuse to believe in a "supernatural" God as if God created rules of the universe, by preforming a mericle is not God breaking his own rule? Which does not justify the sense of omnipotenet/perfection associated with God. During other times, ultiitarians such as Mills believe God is only important if the God is a God who loves his people and wants the greatest happiness for all. These are just two examples, there are many reasons to believe or to not believe in God. ~ my two cents
|