Quote:
Originally posted by Lebell
Aside from a nonsensical title to the thread that has nothing to do with the article, what about it is wrong?
|
Implied support of Serbian war crimes against Muslims
Apparent approval of dropping a bomb on the French embassy, which if it was a "mistake" rather than a mistake, would have been an act of war, which at very best would have caused a break down in trade between American and most of Europe which would have damaged both economies
Approval of the policy of inciting war between and arming both Iran and Iraq, a conflict that cost millions of lives - which she believes was Reagan's policy.
Constant demonising of Muslims and approval of violence against Muslim people in retaliation for any crimes carried out by unrelated Muslims 9 (for example - Libya harbors a terrorist who kills a US soldier, therefore America bomb Libya and kill Gaddhafi's daughter and this is great)
The intent of the article is to dehumanize Muslims, and to incite violence against Muslims, in all but words Coulter is calling for a holy war against Islam.
Attempting to politicize a terrorist attack against America and claim it only happened because of Clinton
Constant disregard and contempt for the Muslim victimes of the killings she lists.
An inaccurate and wrong headed understanding of current events... do we really believe, for example, the American actions in Iraq and Afghanistan have made Islam more friendly to America? Do we believe that the chances of American's being killed in conflict with any Islamic groups have now vastly decreased?