I was not asking the original question because I thought that the Americans' victory was suspicious. I asked the question because the theory had not been disproven.
You cannot be offended that I recognize the Americans' victory as unlikely. Everybody knows this to be so. The story isn't inspiring or entertaining if that is not so.
Quote:
|
There's a million reasons why the Russians could have lost in a one-game, winner takes all, tournament.
|
And one of the millions of reasons they could have won is...cheating. I did not, however say this was so. I said they COULD have cheated. I am trying to be reasonable. It is not reasonable to write off a theory based on emotional bias. I feel like I have supplied plenty of reasons for me to ask a question in a forum about paranoia. The only reason I keep on responding to some of you people is because you're tossing softballs of debate at me. I'm not going to stop responding to these preposterous messages until someone shows me I had no reason or right to introduce this thread.