Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
I say fuck a woman's right to choice, I prefer a humans right to life. Bush doesn't treat homosexuals as second class citizens. He calls to respect and treat them with dignity, and neither he nor I have to agree with them. How does Bush doing the will of his constituents and curbing judicial activism equal discrimination? Civil Unions will grant gays the same rights as straight people, and he is not opposed to that. 50%+/- don't agree with abortion, even more in the range of 60%+ aren't down with homosexual marriage.
P.S. If pro-life = "anti-choice" then pro-choice = pro-abortion and death.
|
thats a pretty extreme view on things. what if a woman was raped, or a teenager got pregnant, would they be required to carry the baby to full term and look after it?
Why does the views of a population have to influence the progression of society either? i imagine in the 50's there was a large chunk of the population opposed to giving black people rights, but it doesn't mean that it was wrong.
the point is that the world is constantly evolving, and trying to resist that is futile. it's become a way of life that gay people are creating relationships that are easily classed as marriages, and have done for many years. why does the fact that they are of the same sex automatically prevent them from being married?