Well, I guess the fact that these companies have been BUILT on and have PROFITTED on slavery has NOTHING to do with it... with the intention of PROFITTING by forcebly keeping people in slavery isn't a factor either..
Here's an DOCUMENTED FACT: They came and "bought" people who clearly did not belong to them, ship them half a world away, make then pick their cotton and tobacco and all that whatnot, never paid them a cent, forced long hours on them, beat, raped, killed, lynched for sport, force them into servitude, made them even breed to make more slaves for them (Do this for about 7 generations..) Tell them they have no rights and never will be "equal", steal their culture and make them understand yours, all the while the "owners" are doing it all just to make money and become multimillionaries, and you tell me you have a "problem understanding why this lawsuit is happening.
How blind some of you can be, it isn't about "payback".
Look between the lines..
Now, they have the "hand caught in the cookiejar".
This is a "genetic fingerprint" that big business went only with the intention of getting slaves...
And "IF" I made a product that clearly causes death and sickness, and then injected more chemicals just to make it even more addictive, how quick would they pull it off the market and I'd get sued?
Big money talks..
Ray Charles is blind, are you too?
I guess if I took of you over there to work a diamond or gold mine and hit it big and made millions and didn't pay you anything at all, you'd sue..
Oh... DeBeers Diamond Inc. has already done that.... and Exxon.. and Mobil... and BG.... and...
__________________
I'd hit that so hard whoever could pull me out would become King of England!
Last edited by BuDDaH; 03-31-2004 at 10:41 PM..
|