|
I guess I picked exactly the examples discussed in Lebell's link: the evolution of birds and the complexity of the eye. What are the chances of that?
Anyways, thanks for correcting me. But I still think something's fishy about how neatly parts of organisms seem to fit together.
By the way, some of the examples from Lebell's link could be interpreted as *supporting* intelligent design - like the stuff about the 13-letter word and how something as complex as that could be "randomly" generated quite simply w/ the help of a selection mechanism. But that couldn't be the way selection "naturally" (without a designer) works in organisms. If there's a fixed goal (a certain 13-letter word / a certain organism - man, maybe??) that's being selected for there's your intelligent design right there. The "hand of god" made things such that over time organisms were perfected so that eventually God was able to create a living being in His image, yada, yada, yada. An evolutionist couldn't use that 13-letter-word argument except against the most hardcore of creationists. An IDer *could* use that against evolutionists, though. I thought that was pretty funny.
|