There is no such thing as a retroactive supoena. It's not like we can walk into the local utility, start browsing through records, and find ones that we like, and then have a judge issue a supoena for those records. The utility companies don't have an open door policy like that when it comes to the police.
I don't see the fact that they raided several homes in one day as odd. It is common for several investigations to be going on around the same time, and the raids to be conducted at the same time. Just because several raids were conducted the same day does not mean that all the probable cause was gained at the same time.
Mondak, what I'm trying to say is that you don't know what actually occurred. Neither do I. The difference is that you seem to have a distrust of the police, and I have a strong trust. Like you said, when you have a hammer, all your problems seem to look like nails. Conversely, when you have a distrust of the police, you believe that everything they do is done unethically and without reason. You start to assume that things are done in reverse and without reason.
I am on the inside looking out. I see how things are actually done and why they are done. I'm not trying to claim that there aren't problems, and that there isn't corruption, but it bothers me when people take a certain set of facts and assume that corruption is taking place. Neither of us know what exactly was done. Neither of us know if there actually was an anonymous tip, or whether or not there was a positive hit by a drug dog. You will always assume that there was not, and I will always assume that there was.
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
|