Quote:
Originally posted by Thagrastay
[B]As I said before- there are plenty of facts to disprove evolution,[/q]
|
Show me the money!
I'd love to hear such facts...as long as they are
a)true and
b)relevant.
some common arguments:
Evolution is a theory: Irrelevant
Evolution has never been observed: false
Speciation has never been directly observed: false and irrelvenat
Evolution violates thermodynamics: completely false.
etc.
Quote:
|
but evolution does not allow these into their paradigm and it merely closes ranks and closets its ideas until it can shift gears with a new spin, or talks a bit louder and with more force over you so that you must then stop civil discourse altogether, and then they feel they have gained the day.
|
If anything stops civil discourse it is when people close their ears and minds, and sink into flat out
denial. "La la la...can't hear you"
Quote:
Evolution is nothing more than a religion, csfilm. There is no shame in admitting that.
I will nominat you and Lebell for pontiff and bishop, if you would like as well and this can be your very own order, then!
Evolution is no more a science than the tarot or tea leaves, because the ones making the interpretations are also the ones hiding behind the mirrors and teaching the classes.
|
Please, define these words for me:
Science
Religion
Is it a religion to believe that the earth revolves around the sun?
Is it a religion that things fall down not up?
what is
not religion?
"Evolution is no more a science than the tarot or tea leaves"...please give me an example of something that actually
is science, and explain explictly how it is fundamentally different from evolution.
This is the very reason why such arguments tend to go around in circles. Because creationists refuse to address any of the points made. You claim that evolution is unfalsifiable, I made a long post explaining PLENTY of ways in which evolution could be falsifed. Please address these points, and show how I am wrong, rather than simply re-stating your argument in different words (which as you can see, is the response that I have come to predict...see my last post on page1).